Wins
#1: Image Generation
Yes, we still need stock photos from time to time. Instead of combing through websites like Pexels or Adobe Stock, we can simply put a prompt into the AI engine. It may be as simple as depicting our logo on a lifestyle picture or removing some details from an existing photo. Perhaps we sell frames and need to create pictures to represent within the frame.
Or, we simply need hero images for website content.
ChatGPT’s DALL-E3 image generator is the best for creating new images, while Adobe’s Firefly is the best for modifying and adjusting images.
ChatGPT has many artistic styles to influence its output. You can find a non-exhaustive list here.
Here are some additional suggestions:
- You can ask ChatGPT to reverse-engineer a photo it created. Simply add the image to the chat area and say, “What is the prompt to create an image like this?” Use that prompt, and you’ll be surprised at how close it is.
- One frustration is the inconsistency with image output. Every image generated seems to be from entirely different sources. Generated image #5 might be perfect except for one thing, but generated image #6 is radically different. There are some tricks to make more consistent art.
#2: Information Distillation
Product descriptions, articles, and emails all have something in common. They need a shortened edition, a headline/subject/meta description.
With ChatGPT, all you have to do is use a prompt like this:
give me three SEO-optimized meta descriptions for this page: https://www.jthomashome.com/products/walnut-floating-shelves
Take the best of the three and run with it.
#3: The Big Picture
You’re writing an article about a subject you are familiar with, perhaps like the back of your hand. You get feedback that you missed a few critical points only after release. I’ve been there and done that. It’s not the end of the world, but wouldn’t it be nice to catch this earlier?
You bet.
Write a question like this:
Give me bullet points of what are some considerations that restaurants use to determine what type of glasses to serve their patrons.
I find that roughly half of the suggestions align with what I’m thinking; a quarter are irrelevant or duplicates of each other, and the remainder are angles that I didn’t think of.
As a side note, Claude AI is better than ChatGPT for writing. Its output is far more natural. I still use ChatGPT because it has more features (like image generation).